Which practice best supports credible cross-text synthesis?

Which practice best supports credible cross-text synthesis?

• A. Repeat a single detail from one source
• B. Cite multiple sources with evidence from each
• C. Present only data that confirms your view
• D. Paraphrase one source without indicating others

Answer: (B)

Cross-text synthesis is about combining ideas from multiple texts to form a well-supported understanding. The best practice is to cite multiple sources and include evidence from each so you show you considered a range of perspectives and weighed the information from different authors. This approach demonstrates credibility because it avoids relying on a single point and lets you compare how various sources support or challenge a claim. It also adds depth by bringing in diverse types of evidence and by clearly attributing ideas to their sources, which helps readers judge the strength of your connections. Repeating a single detail from one source provides a narrow view and can mislead if other sources offer different evidence. Presenting only data that confirms your view shows bias and ignores other relevant information you should consider. Paraphrasing one source without indicating others hides the broader dialogue among texts and reduces transparency about where ideas come from.

Cross-text synthesis is about combining ideas from multiple texts to form a well-supported understanding. The best practice is to cite multiple sources and include evidence from each so you show you considered a range of perspectives and weighed the information from different authors. This approach demonstrates credibility because it avoids relying on a single point and lets you compare how various sources support or challenge a claim. It also adds depth by bringing in diverse types of evidence and by clearly attributing ideas to their sources, which helps readers judge the strength of your connections.

Repeating a single detail from one source provides a narrow view and can mislead if other sources offer different evidence. Presenting only data that confirms your view shows bias and ignores other relevant information you should consider. Paraphrasing one source without indicating others hides the broader dialogue among texts and reduces transparency about where ideas come from.